# Rewriting the scope\_all benchmark in Sequel and Raw

**URL:** <https://community.rubybench.org/t/rewriting-the-scope-all-benchmark-in-sequel-and-raw/138>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [May 14, 2017, 6:59pm UTC](https://community.rubybench.org/t/rewriting-the-scope-all-benchmark-in-sequel-and-raw/138 "2017-05-14T18:59:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.rubybench.org/sam/32/5_2.png) [@sam](https://community.rubybench.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2017, 2:21pm UTC](https://community.rubybench.org/t/rewriting-the-scope-all-benchmark-in-sequel-and-raw/138/14 "2017-05-17T14:21:07Z")

</div>

> [@bmarkons](#):
>
> you want me to include here commits for sequel and pg. Therefore it would have 3 lines (AR, sequel, pg) and graph would look something like thi

Yes, absolutely, this is what I want you to work towards!

> [@bmarkons](#):
>
> Maybe better place to display results for older Rails releases would be here?

Possibly, let’s not worry about that for now, just for now worry about getting the graph with the 3 lines going and backfilling all the info. Work with @system on gaining access to prd.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.rubybench.org/t/rewriting-the-scope-all-benchmark-in-sequel-and-raw/138)._